Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Analysis of Functional Movement Screen Scores According to Playing Positions in Elite Junior Female Volleyball Players

Gökhan Tuna · Research in Sports Science · 2026

This study evaluated movement quality using the Functional Movement Screen test in 62 elite junior female volleyball players across different positions (outside hitters, middle blockers, setters, liberos, and opposite hitters). While overall scores didn't differ significantly by position, outside hitters showed better movement quality than opposite hitters, and 79% of all players scored in the at-risk range for injury, with opposite hitters and middle blockers showing particularly high risk.
Takeaway: Implement position-specific movement quality training and corrective exercises for junior female volleyball players, especially opposite hitters and middle blockers, to address injury risk.
Abstract (source)

Volleyball imposes substantial neuromuscular and biomechanical demands that vary by playing position, yet position-specific differences in movement quality remain underexplored. This cross-sectional study examined Functional Movement Screen scores in elite female volleyball players by playing position and interpreted

Findings: in terms of movement quality, stability–mobility balance, and injury risk. Sixty-two elite junior (adolescent) female players (mean age 14.7 ± 1.5 years; libero n = 9; middle blocker n = 11; setter n = 14; opposite hitter n = 3; outside hitter n = 25) competing in top-tier national leagues participated voluntarily. The seven-subtest Functional Movement Screen was administered by a single Functional Movement Screen–certified evaluator under standardized conditions. Two missing subtest cells were imputed using a K-Nearest-Neighbors procedure (k = 5). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Shapiro–Wilk normality tests, one-way analysis of variance, analysis of covariance controlling for age and body mass index, Mann–Whitney U pairwise comparisons with Hedges’ g effect sizes, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlations. Total Functional Movement Screen scores did not differ significantly across positions (F(4, 57) = 1.59, p = .19, η² = .10), but the moderate effect size and large pairwise contrasts (opposite vs. outside hedges’ g = −1.33) suggested potentially meaningful position differences. Outside hitters exhibited the highest mean (13.68 ± 1.75), and opposite hitters the lowest (11.33 ± 1.16). Using the Functional Movement Screen ≤ 14 threshold, 79.0% of athletes were classified as at-risk, peaking among opposite hitters (100%) and middle blockers (90.9%). Anthropometric correlations were weak (r ≤ .12). The

findings support integrating position-tailored, movement-quality-based corrective training into volleyball performance and injury-prevention programs. Cite this article as: Tuna, G. (2026). Analysis of functional movement screen scores according to playing positions in elite junior female volleyball players. Research in Sports Science, 16, 0034, doi: 10.5152/rss.2026.26034.

Primary studyOpen accessWomen's & Youth Athletics
Read the original →