Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Estimation of resting metabolic rate in professional soccer players: A cross-sectional study comparing traditional predictive equations and a preliminary machine learning model against indirect calorimetry

Carlos Abraham Herrera-Amante, Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda, Eduardo Báez-San Martín, César Octavio Ramos-García, Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz, Rodrigo Olivares et al. · PLoS ONE · 2026

Researchers measured resting metabolic rate (calories burned at rest) in 40 male professional soccer players using indirect calorimetry, the gold-standard lab method, and compared it with twelve common prediction equations plus an experimental machine learning model. All twelve equations agreed poorly with the lab measurement and overestimated calorie needs by roughly 8% to 36%, while the machine learning model had somewhat smaller errors but still explained little of the variation between players.
Takeaway: Treat standard resting-calorie equations as rough starting points for trained athletes, and use lab measurement when precise energy targets matter.
Abstract (source)

Background: Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is a major component of total daily energy expenditure and varies according to age, sex, and body composition. Although indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard, predictive equations are widely used in practice. This study evaluated the agreement between twelve traditional RMR equations and IC in professional soccer players and explored a preliminary machine learning approach.

Methods: Forty male professional soccer players (22.5 ± 4.4 years) were assessed. RMR measured by IC was compared with twelve predictive equations. A support vector regression (SVR) model was developed using anthropometric variables and evaluated under internal validation.

Results: All equations showed poor concordance with IC (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: -0.094 to 0.030) and overestimated RMR (8.38% to 36.38%). The SVR model achieved a mean absolute error of 169.3 kcal·day-1 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 190.7 kcal·day-1. Its prediction error was lower than the RMSE and average bias of traditional equations, indicating improved individual-level accuracy. However, it explained a limited proportion of variance (R2 = 0.169).

Conclusion: Traditional equations showed poor agreement with indirect calorimetry in this sample of soccer players. These

Findings: highlight the risks of relying on conventional predictive equations in professional athletes. Preliminary

results suggest that machine learning models may improve estimation under internal validation, providing a proof of concept for data-driven approaches in this field. However, their predictive capacity remains limited, and external validation in larger and independent cohorts is required.

Observational / cohortOpen accessSports Nutrition & Supplements
Read the original