Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Functional movement patterns and bilateral asymmetry in badminton athletes: A Functional Movement Screen analysis at the Malang Regional Training Center

Avi Kholifatuz Zahro', Muhammad Atiq Noviudin Pritama ยท Physical Education and Sports Studies and Research ยท 2026

Researchers screened 16 sub-elite badminton players (ages 15-20) with the 7-part Functional Movement Screen to see how well they moved and whether their left and right sides differed. Most athletes (62.5%) fell into the moderate injury-risk band, and side-to-side asymmetry was widespread \u2014 every athlete showed shoulder mobility asymmetry, with in-line lunge and rotary stability asymmetry in 62.5%.
Takeaway: Screen both sides separately for movement asymmetries, especially shoulder mobility, and target the weaker side with corrective work.
Abstract (source)

Background: Badminton involves repetitive unilateral overhead movements, rapid changes of direction, and explosive actions that may contribute to side-to-side differences in functional movement patterns.

Objectives: This study aimed to describe functional movement patterns and bilateral asymmetry among badminton athletes at the Malang Regional Training Center using the Functional Movement Screen (FMS).

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 16 sub-elite badminton athletes aged 15โ€“20 years selected through purposive sampling. Functional movement was assessed using the seven-component FMS. Total scores were classified as high (โ‰ค14), moderate (15โ€“17), or low (18โ€“21) injury risk. Bilateral asymmetry was identified from differences between right- and left-side scores in five bilateral FMS components. Data were analyzed descriptively using means, standard deviations, frequencies, and percentages.

Results: Most athletes (62.5%, n = 10) were classified as having moderate injury risk, while 18.75% (n = 3) were classified as high risk and 18.75% (n = 3) as low risk. Shoulder Mobility showed the highest prevalence of bilateral asymmetry (100%, n = 16), followed by the In-Line Lunge and Rotary Stability (62.5%, n = 10 each), Hurdle Step (50.0%, n = 8), and Active Straight Leg Raise (43.75%, n = 7).

Conclusions: Bilateral functional movement asymmetry was common among badminton athletes, particularly in shoulder mobility, while most athletes were classified within the moderate injury-risk category. These

Findings: support functional movement screening to identify movement limitations and inform individualized corrective exercise strategies.

Primary studyOpen accessWomen's & Youth Athletics
Read the original โ†’