Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Hormonal Contraceptive Use, Neuromuscular Performance, and Musculoskeletal Health During Military Training.

Goulart JB, Forse JN, Feigel ED, Bird MB, Steele EJ, McCarthy AM et al. · Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme · 2026

Abstract (source)

Despite data showing half of active-duty servicewomen use hormonal contraception, its impact on physical performance during military training remains unclear. This study examined differences in general and military-specific physical performance and bone health changes based on hormonal contraceptive use. 185 female Marine Officer Candidates (MOCs) were grouped by self-reported menstrual/hormonal contraceptive status. Questionnaires, countermovement jumps (CMJ), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), physical fitness tests (PFT), peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT; 4%, 38%, 66% tibia length), and bone biomarkers were assessed at the start and end of the 10-week program. A combat fitness test (CFT) was completed during training. Mixed ANOVAs (group*time) assessed training responses. Among 104 MOCs not using hormonal contraception (Non-Users; age=25[IQR; 22, 27], BMI=23.98±1.98) and 81 MOCs using hormonal contraception (Users; age=24[IQR; 22,26], BMI=23.97±2.19), Users showed no change in CMJ reactive strength index, while Non-Users decreased (interaction p=0.042; Non-Users Δ= -0.03, p<0.001). CMJ jump height was lower in Users than Non-Users (mean difference=-0.02m, p=0.031). CMJ performance decreased overall (all p<0.001); braking and propulsive metrics increased (p≤0.005). PFT total points improved (Δ=6.05 points; p<0.001); total volumetric bone mineral density increased (4% site, Δ=1.37±0.62 mg/ cm3;p=0.029), cortical density decreased (38% site: Δ=-3.04±1.45 mg/ cm3, p=0.038, 66% site: Δ=-2.91±1.35 mg/ cm3, p=0.033); bone formation markers (P1NP: Δ=9.40±1.91 μg/ L; OC Δ=3.42±0.74 ng/ mL; both p<0.001) increased. CFT scores were similar between groups (p≥0.304). Among Non-Users, self-reported menstrual cycle irregularity increased. Users demonstrated minor differences in neuromuscular performance/fatigue, but small in effect. Hormonal contraception use was not meaningfully associated with military outcomes.

Read the original →