Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Potential Links Between Physiological and Perceptual Strain in High Heat Stress

Xiujing Zhao, Brendon P. McDermott, Wen‐Juo Lo · European Journal of Sport Science · 2026

This study examined whether how hard people *feel* they're working during exercise in heat correlates with measured physiological strain (heart rate and core temperature changes). The researchers found very strong correlations between perceived strain and physiological strain measures, and that perceived strain was good at identifying when someone was experiencing high physiological strain, but the two methods weren't interchangeable enough to use them as direct substitutes for each other.
Takeaway: Use perceived exertion and thermal sensation as a practical screening tool for physiological strain during exercise in heat when direct measurements aren't available, but recognize they won't precisely match actual physiological readings.
Abstract (source)

ABSTRACT The physiological strain index (PhSI) is widely used to quantify thermoregulatory and cardiovascular strain during heat stress. However, direct physiological measurements may not always be feasible in occupational or athletic settings. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the relationship and agreement between perceptual strain and integrated physiological strain indices during high heat stress. Ten healthy, physically active, non‐heat‐acclimated males (29 (7) yr; 1.79 (0.11) m; 77.4 (9.3) kg) completed two randomized crossover exercise trials in hot‐dry (HD) and warm‐humid (WH) environments with equivalent wet‐bulb globe temperatures. Heart rate, rectal temperature, skin temperature, rating of perceived exertion, and thermal sensation were measured at baseline and every 15 minutes during 60 minutes of cycling. Physiological strain index (PhSI), adaptive physiological strain index (aPhSI), and perceptual strain index (PeSI) were calculated using validated equations. Repeated‐measures correlation analyses demonstrated very strong associations between PeSI and both PhSI and aPhSI under HD ( R rm = 0.940–0.943) and WH ( R rm = 0.980–0.982; all p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated good‐to‐excellent discrimination of physiological strain by PeSI (AUC = 0.895–0.969). Mixed‐effects analyses showed that higher PeSI values were associated with increased PhSI ( β = 1.325, p < 0.001) and aPhSI ( β = 1.459, p < 0.001). However, Bland‐Altman analyses demonstrated relatively small mean biases (0.4–0.9 AU) but wide limits of agreement (−2.8 to 4.2 AU), indicating that PeSI and physiological strain indices are not interchangeable. These

Findings: suggest that PeSI may serve as a practical adjunctive or screening indicator of physiological strain when direct physiological measurements are unavailable.

Randomized controlled trialOpen accessSports Nutrition & Supplements
Read the original →