Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

The reliability and measurement error of the movement quality assessment for athletes

Gyan A. Wijekulasuriya, Carl T. Woods, Aden Kittel, Paul Larkin · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · 2026

Researchers tested whether the Movement Quality Assessment for Athletes (MQA-A), a new tool for evaluating how well athletes move, produces consistent and reliable scores. The study found that the MQA-A showed good reliability when the same rater scored athletes twice, when different raters scored the same athletes, and when scoring was done live versus from video.
Takeaway: Use the MQA-A as a reliable method to assess movement quality in adolescent athletes.
Abstract (source)

Introduction: The Movement Quality Assessment for Athletes (MQA-A) was recently developed, however, the reliability of its scoring procedure is yet to be determined. Thus, the

Aim: of this study was to determine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, agreement between live and video scoring

Methods: and measurement error of the MQA-A.

Methods The athletic movement quality of 50 adolescent athletes (age: 16.1 ± 0.6 years, mass: 81.7 ± 6.1 kg, height: 173.9 ± 10.5 cm) was measured using the MQA-A by two experienced raters, both live and via video. Intra-rater reliability was determined using the movement quality scores of a single rater, inter-rater reliability was determined for live and video scores and agreement between live and video scoring

Methods The athletic movement quality of 50 adolescent athletes (age: 16.1 ± 0.6 years, mass: 81.7 ± 6.1 kg, height: 173.9 ± 10.5 cm) was measured using the MQA-A by two experienced raters, both live and via video. Intra-rater reliability was determined using the movement quality scores of a single rater, inter-rater reliability was determined for live and video scores and agreement between live and video scoring methods were assessed.

Results: Intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability for video and live scoring

methods was evident (ICC ≥ 0.90, K w : 0.39–0.90). There was preliminary evidence for agreement between live and video scoring (ICC = 0.86, K w : 0.61–0.82).

Discussion: Thus, the MQA-A offers a reliable tool for measuring athletic movement quality in adolescent athletes.

Primary studyOpen accessWomen's & Youth Athletics
Read the original →