Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Association between dietary intake, energy availability, and recovery in young sub-elite Moroccan football players.

Ait Aammi Hadi EM, El Ouali EM, Akhittouch A, Rimy H, Zehhaf F, Kassimi K et al. · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026

This study tracked 19 young Moroccan football players over four weeks to see how their daily food intake and energy availability (calories consumed minus calories burned) affected their recovery after training, matches, and rest days. The researchers found that players had significantly lower energy availability on training days compared to match and rest days, and that higher energy availability was strongly linked to lower perceived effort and better subjective recovery, though the connection to jumping performance was weak.
Takeaway: Monitor your energy availability (especially relative to training demand) and track perceived exertion and recovery feelings to identify when you're underfueling.
Abstract (source)

Background: Energy availability is recognized as an important factor for health and performance in athletes, yet data in male football players and its relationship with post-exercise recovery remain limited. This study aimed to examine the associations between daily energy intake, energy availability, and recovery outcomes in football players.

Methods: Nineteen outfield U21 players ( n = 19) from a national championship in Morocco were monitored over four in-season weeks. On one training day, one rest day and one official match day per week, players completed 24-h dietary recalls, from which energy intake and macronutrient intake were quantified using Nutrilog software. Exercise energy expenditure was estimated and energy availability was calculated. Internal load was assessed using session rating of perceived exertion, subjective recovery with the Perceived Recovery Status scale 24-h post-session, and neuromuscular recovery via countermovement jump height.

Results: Mean daily EI did not differ significantly between match, training, and rest days ( p = 0.066), whereas EA was significantly lower on training days compared with match and rest days (both p ≤ 0.003). Higher EA was strongly associated with lower RPE ( ρ = -0.597, p ρ = 0.273, p = 0.001), while its association with CMJ was small and non-significant ( ρ = 0.124, p = 0.132). Higher EI showed a moderate inverse correlation with RPE ( ρ = -0.404, p ρ = 0.173, p = 0.035), but no significant association with CMJ. Across EA categories, RPE, PRS and CMJ all differed significantly ( p ≤ 0.014).

Conclusion: Inadequate fueling relative to training demands leads to reduced EA, particularly on training days, and is associated with a lower recovery profile. Monitoring EA alongside simple field-based markers such as RPE and PRS may help practitioners identify periods of suboptimal fueling and adjust nutritional strategies accordingly.

Primary studyOpen accessRecovery & Sleep
Read the original →