Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Associations between incremental exercise capacity and multimodal brain characteristics across training levels.

Zhang K, Jiang L, Wang Y, Yan Q, Cao C, Zhang D. ยท Frontiers in human neuroscience ยท 2026

Researchers scanned the brains of 32 men "high-level endurance athletes, moderately trained runners, and active controls" and compared brain structure and resting activity with treadmill test results like VO2max and lactate threshold. Better endurance capacity was linked to differences in brain regions involved in planning, movement and coordination (prefrontal, premotor, precuneus, temporal and cerebellar areas), though comparisons between training-level groups were unstable and the authors urge caution.
Takeaway: Treat this as early correlational evidence that endurance fitness tracks with brain characteristics, not proof that training changes your brain.
Abstract (source)

Background: Previous work has shown that endurance training is associated with structural and functional plasticity in prefrontal, hippocampal, cerebellar and network level regions using both cross sectional and longitudinal designs. The present study extends this foundation by examining how key endurance indicators relate to multimodal neural characteristics across different training levels.

Methods: Thirty-two male participants were classified into high level endurance athletes, moderately trained runners and healthy active controls. All participants completed structural MRI and resting state functional MRI together with graded exercise testing to assess maximal oxygen consumption, relative maximal oxygen consumption, lactate threshold and individual lactate threshold (ILT). Gray matter volume, fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations and degree centrality were extracted from predefined regions of interest. Correlation analyses were first conducted in the full sample and within subgroups, followed by false discovery rate correction within imaging modalities. Associations surviving FDR correction were further evaluated using Spearman rank correlations, bootstrap confidence intervals for subgroup

Findings: , and covariate-adjusted partial correlations as sensitivity analyses.

Results: Across all participants, incremental exercise-capacity indicators were associated with multimodal neural characteristics in prefrontal, premotor, precuneus, temporal, and posterior cerebellar regions, with additional negative associations observed in the thalamus and inferior cerebellum in the uncorrected analyses. After FDR correction, the surviving associations became more selective. Subgroup analyses suggested descriptively different association patterns across training levels, but these subgroup

findings were less stable in sensitivity analyses and should therefore be interpreted cautiously.

Conclusion: Incremental exercise-capacity indicators were associated with distributed multimodal brain characteristics, and several core associations remained robust after multiple-comparison correction and supplementary analyses. The subgroup

results suggested stage-related differences in brain-physiology coupling, particularly a broader pattern in moderately trained individuals and a more focal prefrontal-associated profile in high-level athletes, although these

results suggested stage-related differences in brain-physiology coupling, particularly a broader pattern in moderately trained individuals and a more focal prefrontal-associated profile in high-level athletes, although these findings still require cautious interpretation.

Read the original โ†’