Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Cardiorespiratory and autonomic trajectories in cadets training for general versus strength endurance, with differential ventilatory economization: a 4-month observational study.

Romanchuk O, Svyshch Y, Guzii O. ยท European journal of applied physiology ยท 2026

Researchers followed 52 male military cadets for 4 months, comparing those doing mainly general endurance training with those doing strength-endurance training, and measured resting heart, blood pressure, breathing and autonomic function. Only the strength-endurance group showed significant changes โ€” a lower resting heart rate (about -10%) and roughly 24% lower resting minute ventilation and oxygen uptake โ€” and the only reliable difference between groups was this breathing 'economization'; heart-rate variability measures didn't change significantly.
Takeaway: Include strength-endurance work if you want measurable gains in resting cardiorespiratory efficiency over a few months, but treat these early findings as preliminary.
Abstract (source)

Introduction: Physical training reshapes cardiovascular and autonomic regulation, yet the resting divergence between general- and strength-endurance loading is poorly characterized in cadets.

Methods: In this observational study, male cadets administratively assigned to predominantly general- (n = 27) or strength-endurance (n = 25) training were examined before and after a 4-month programme. Resting electrocardiography, heart-rate, blood-pressure and respiratory variability, breathing pattern and baroreflex sensitivity were recorded by spiroarteriocardiorhythmography during spontaneous and paced (0.1, 0.25 Hz) breathing. Within-group change was tested with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and the group ร— time interaction with Mann-Whitney tests on change scores, under Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate control.

Results: Significant within-group change was confined to the strength-endurance group: lower heart rate (- 9.8%), longer RR (+ 10.8%) and QT (+ 4.8%), a higher systolic-pressure LF/HF ratio (+ 91%) and respiratory changes including minute ventilation and VOโ‚‚ (both - 23.8%; all q โ‰ค 0.043). The general-endurance group changed significantly only in QT and the Skibinski index. Groups did not differ in absolute values; however, the group ร— time interaction was significant only in the ventilatory domain and persisted after normalization to body mass (p = 0.008), whereas chronotropic, spectral-HRV and haemodynamic changes did not. Controlled-breathing reactivity declined in both groups; fitness improved across a military-applied battery, most in strength endurance.

Discussion: These exploratory

Findings: suggest that the divergence between loadings is one of within-programme trajectory rather than absolute level, the only robust between-group signal being ventilatory economization. Spectral HRV did not change significantly, and the autonomic and cardiac

findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating.

Observational / cohortEndurance & Cardiovascular
Read the original โ†’