Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Fluctuation of conflict and attentional processes underlying inhibitory control during high-intensity interval training.

Kuznik A, Wang CH, Fernandes IA, Amireault S, Kao SC. · International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2026

This study had 31 adults perform mental attention tasks while doing high-intensity interval training on a bike, measuring their accuracy, reaction time, and brain electrical activity to track how well they could control their attention. During hard exercise intervals, people got faster but made more mistakes on tricky tasks and showed reduced brain signals related to attention control, though these changes reversed during recovery periods.
Takeaway: Schedule cognitively demanding tasks during recovery periods rather than intense exercise intervals if you need to maintain accuracy in physically demanding situations.
Abstract (source)

Exercise can impair and improve inhibitory control (IC) and influence IC-related neuroelectric mechanisms during and after exercise, respectively. However, it remains unknown whether these effects coexist and fluctuate during intermittent exercise consisting of elevated physical exertion separated by recovery periods, despite the similarity of this exercise modality to athletic, military, and first-respond activities in applied settings. This study investigated IC fluctuation during a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) session alternating between exercise and recovery intervals. Thirty-one adults performed flanker tasks during a 33-min cycling-based HIIT and a rest control on counterbalanced days. Accuracy, response time (RT), and task-related N2/P3 event-related potentials were recorded to index IC. Compared with the control condition, overall RT decreased while accuracy declined selectively for incongruent trials during exercise intervals of HIIT. The HIIT condition showed an earlier onset of RT decrease over repeated exercise-recovery cycles, culminating in shorter RT toward ending intervals compared to control. Within the HIIT condition, N2 and P3 amplitudes reduced during exercise but rebounded during recovery intervals, while the HIIT condition resulted in suppressed P3 amplitude compared to the control condition only during exercise intervals. Although elevated exertion quickens responses at the cost of downregulated conflict processing, attention allocation, and IC accuracy, these neurocognitive changes are limited to exercise intervals and restored during recovery, with processing speed improvements continuing to accrue beyond exercise intervals. These

Findings: highlight the importance of structuring cognitive tasks around recovery periods in physically demanding situations to mitigate cognitive impairment while leveraging heightened arousal for performance efficiency.

Primary studyRecovery & Sleep
Read the original →