Ground reaction forces in cricket VS sprinting: A comparative analysis

Ground reaction force (GRF) is a central biomechanical variable because it reflects how athletes interact with the ground to generate motion, absorb impact, and manage injury risk. Although quick force production is essential for both sprinting and cricket, the functional

Significance: of GRF varies significantly between the two sports. Bowlers must convert momentum from the run-up into ball release while controlling trunk motion and preserving technical alignment during the front foot contact phase of cricket fast bowling, which is characterized by extremely high impact loads. In contrast, sprinting depends on repetitive cyclical force application, where mean vertical force becomes particularly crucial for reaching and sustaining maximum speed while horizontal propulsive impulses are crucial during acceleration. This paper provides a comparative analysis of GRF characteristics in cricket and sprinting, with particular focus on magnitude, direction, temporal structure, mechanical

Purpose: , and injury implications. Research indicates that whereas sprinting requires more fine control over braking, propulsion, and support forces, cricket fast bowling frequently exposes athletes to larger single-step impact loads. These variations have significant effects on load management, coaching, fitness, and injury prevention in both sports.