Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Injury prevention and athlete health-risk management in freestyle wrestling: a scoping review of direct and transferable evidence

Haolin Wang, Lulu Guo ยท Research in Sports Medicine ยท 2026

This scoping review gathered research published since 2021 on preventing injuries and managing health risks in freestyle and other Olympic-style wrestling, separating wrestling-specific studies from related evidence borrowed from other contexts. It found only 18 wrestling-specific sources, with inconsistent injury-tracking definitions, few screening studies that actually predicted injuries, and just one prevention trial (Wrestling+), which recorded 20 injuries versus 30 in controls, though the authors say the effect estimates were inconsistent.
Takeaway: Treat wrestling injury-screening tests with skepticism, since the evidence base is thin, but consider a structured warm-up program like Wrestling+ as a reasonable option.
Abstract (source)

This scoping review mapped direct evidence on injury prevention and health-risk management in freestyle and other Olympic-style wrestling and distinguished it from cautiously transferable evidence. Following PRISMA-ScR, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus were searched for records published from 1 January 2021 to 14 May 2026. A post hoc source-role audit separated wrestling-specific from contextual sources, and

Findings: were narratively synthesised. Eighteen direct and 41 contextual sources were included: five surveillance studies, seven studies of screening, monitoring or performance proxies, one preventive-intervention trial and five health-risk studies. Surveillance definitions and denominators varied, and most screening studies did not prospectively assess injury prediction. In male cadet freestyle wrestlers, Wrestling+ recorded 20 injuries versus 30 in controls, although inconsistent effect estimates limit interpretation. Standardised surveillance is needed, and Wrestling+ may merit consideration in comparable populations; evidence for screening, health-risk management and implementation remains insufficient.

Read the original โ†’