Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Normalized Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Collegiate American Football: Position-Based Norms and Longitudinal Patterns.

Wilwand M, VanderAkker J, Guymon I, Mortensen BB, Johnson AW. · Journal of strength and conditioning research · 2026

Researchers measured eccentric hamstring strength (Nordic hamstring test on a NordBord) in 332 Division I college football players and adjusted the scores for body weight. Skill, power, and special teams players were stronger per kilogram than linemen, strength also varied by age and by team, and among 50 athletes tracked over three seasons there was essentially no change in normalized strength over time.
Takeaway: Compare hamstring strength relative to body weight against position-specific benchmarks rather than using one raw number for everyone.
Abstract (source)

Abstract Wilwand, M, VanderAkker, J, Guymon, I, Mortensen, BB, and Johnson, AW. Normalized eccentric hamstring strength in collegiate American football: Position-based norms and longitudinal patterns. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-The

Purpose: of this study was to (1) establish normative values for eccentric hamstring strength in collegiate American football players; (2) evaluate how normalized strength differs by player position, age, and team affiliation; and (3) assess longitudinal changes across competitive seasons. Eccentric hamstring strength was measured in 332 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes from 4 teams using the NordBord device and normalized to body mass (N·kg-1). A multiple linear regression identified significant predictors of normalized strength, and longitudinal data from 2 teams (n = 50; 15% of the full sample) were analyzed across 3 seasons using repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results: showed that skill, power, and special teams athletes had significantly greater normalized strength than linemen (p < 0.001), and that age (p = 0.04) and team affiliation, specifically Teams B (p < 0.001) and D (p < 0.001) compared with Team A, were also significant predictors. Effect sizes indicated small-to-large magnitudes of difference between position groups. Post hoc analyses revealed that the skill group had significantly greater strength than the power group (p = 0.008), while the special teams group did not differ significantly from the skill group (p = 0.18). Athletes from 2 teams exhibited lower normalized strength than their peers. Longitudinal analysis showed no significant changes in normalized strength over time (p = 0.89), and trivial effect sizes were observed, suggesting that substantial changes are unlikely within this experienced athlete population. These

Findings: support the use of normalized-rather than absolute-eccentric strength values and highlight meaningful differences by position and program. Practical applications include using position-specific benchmarks to guide individualized training, rehabilitation, and return-to-play strategies aimed at optimizing performance and reducing injury risk in American football athletes.

Read the original →