Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Return to sport after acute patellar tendon repair: identifying key prognostic factors.

Gómez-Macías P, Martínez-Crespo A, Gómez-Palomo JM. · Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR · 2026

Researchers followed 46 adults who had surgery to repair a completely torn patellar tendon, tracking whether and when they got back to sport. About 87% returned to sport at an average of just under 6 months, with higher BMI linked to slower and less likely return, while the specific surgical technique (suture anchors vs. transosseous tunnels) showed no significant difference in outcomes.
Takeaway: Expect roughly six months before returning to sport after patellar tendon repair, and know that managing body weight may matter more to your comeback than which surgical technique was used.
Abstract (source)

Purpose: To answer three clinically oriented questions after acute patellar tendon repair: how often and how quickly patients return to sport (RTS), which patient factors are associated with RTS, and whether repair technique is associated with RTS under a common surgical and rehabilitation protocol.

Methods: Single-centre retrospective cohort of 46 consecutive adults treated for acute complete patellar tendon rupture at a public university hospital (2014-2022). Repairs were performed by a single surgeon using either suture anchors (n = 25) or transosseous tunnels (n = 21); technique availability was determined by hospital tendering/procurement processes. Outcomes were time to RTS and RTS by last follow-up. Analyses were descriptive, with simplified adjusted models for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidity, pre-injury sport impact, and repair technique.

Results: Overall, 87.0% (40/46) returned to sport at a mean of 5.88 +/- 0.35 months. Higher BMI was associated with slower RTS (HR 0.82 per +5 kg/m 2 ; 95% CI 0.68-0.99; p = 0.041) and lower odds of RTS (OR 0.62 per +5 kg/m 2 ; 95% CI 0.39-0.98; p = 0.042). Age showed a non-significant trend toward slower RTS. Descriptive comparisons showed no significant between-technique differences in postoperative outcomes.

Conclusions: Most patients resumed sport during the first postoperative semester. BMI, and less consistently age, appeared more relevant to RTS prognosis than the choice between anchor- and tunnel-based repair, although the small sample size requires cautious interpretation. Level of evidence III; retrospective cohort study.

Observational / cohortInjury Prevention & Rehab
Read the original