Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Validity of the garmin Forerunner 265 to predict VO2max and race performance times.

Howard J, Ellis R, Fortner CK, Doyle JA, Otis J. · Journal of medical engineering & technology · 2026

This study tested whether the Garmin Forerunner 265 fitness tracker could accurately estimate VO2max and predict race performance times compared to actual measured values. The Garmin consistently overestimated VO2max and predicted faster half-marathon times than what runners actually achieved, though the errors were small enough that the device may still be useful for tracking fitness trends over time.
Takeaway: Use your Garmin's VO2max and race predictions as general fitness markers rather than precise individual measurements.
Abstract (source)

Advances in fitness tracker technology have led to increased measurements and predictions of physiological variables, such as VO2max and race prediction times. These data can help develop personalized exercise programs. The validity of wrist-based fitness trackers to estimate VO2max is mixed, and studies have not yet investigated race performance prediction. It was hypothesized that Garmin-estimated VO2max and race prediction times would fall within the INTERLIVE Network's consumer-level acceptability threshold (MAPE p p = 0.009. After 12-weeks of training, estimated VO2max from Garmin (45.00 ± 7.21 ml/kg/min) was significantly higher than criterion (42.43 ± 8.54 ml/kg/min), p =.007. Garmin's race predictions for the half-marathon (129.97 ± 18.29 min) were significantly faster than the official race times (137.55 ± 21.03 min), p =.003. Despite this, mean absolute percent error of VO2max and race prediction were below 10%, indicating the Garmin Forerunner 265 may be suitable for tracking general fitness trends.

Read the original →