Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

A scoping review of muscle excitation in resistance training across key training parameters.

Fischer J, Burger C, Plöschberger G, Konrad A. · Journal of sports sciences · 2026

This scoping review pooled 63 studies (966 participants) that used surface EMG to see how load intensity, range of motion, and rep speed affect how strongly muscles are electrically activated during resistance exercise. Heavier loads and faster reps were generally linked to greater muscle excitation, while greater range of motion boosted activation only when rep speed was controlled — otherwise results were inconsistent.
Takeaway: Use heavier loads and a deliberately fast lifting tempo if your goal is maximal muscle activation, but don't read too much into EMG-based range-of-motion claims.
Abstract (source)

Resistance training is widely recognized for its health and performance benefits. Since muscle activation correlates with muscle strength and performance, optimizing training variables to maximize activation during resistance training exercises is of interest. However, the most effective approach remains debated. This scoping review examines the impact of training variables such as intensity, range of motion (ROM), and repetition duration on muscle excitation, measured via surface electromyography (sEMG), in healthy, pain-free adults (≥18 years). Only original research in English was considered, focusing on acute bipolar sEMG assessments. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 63 studies (35 on intensity, 13 on ROM, 15 on repetition duration) involving 966 participants. The

Findings: indicate that higher training intensities generally produce greater sEMG signals. In addition, faster repetition durations are linked to increased muscle excitation, and greater ROM enhances excitation when repetition speed is controlled. However, when velocity is not standardized, ROM

findings remain inconsistent. The current evidence suggests that higher intensity and faster repetitions increase muscle activation, while the effects of ROM remain unclear. Future research should focus on addressing these gaps and improving the experimental

Design: to better understand the interplay of these training variables on muscle excitation.

Read the original