Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Fragmented versus traditional resistance training: a randomized controlled trial on muscular strength, endurance, and enjoyment in recreationally trained young adults

Rongxuan Zhai, Kunnian Yang, Hanya Dai, Yulu Wang, Yushan Jiang, Xudong Wu et al. Β· Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness Β· 2026

Abstract (source)

Traditional resistance training requires prolonged continuous sessions, which may limit participation among time-constrained individuals. Fragmented resistance training (FRT), derived from β€˜exercise snacking,’ may offer a more flexible alternative, but comparative evidence with traditional resistance training (TRT) remains limited. This study examined the effects of 8 weeks of FRT and TRT on muscular fitness and exercise enjoyment in 45 recreationally trained male students (18–25 years, β‰₯6 months training). Participants were randomised to FRT (three daily short bouts, 1Γ—20 squats each), TRT (one continuous session, 3Γ—20 squats), or a time-matched control group. Training was performed three times/week for 8 weeks using Smith-machine squats, with volume matched and intensity progressing from 40% to 55% of 1RM. Outcomes included 1RM strength, isometric squat force, relative muscular endurance (repetitions at 40% of current 1RM), and PACES enjoyment. Both FRT and TRT significantly outperformed the control in 1RM strength (FRT: +20.59 kg [8.69–32.49], p < 0.001; TRT: +28.93 kg [17.05–40.82], p < 0.001), isometric squat force (FRT: +27.89 kgf [12.15–43.64], p < 0.001; TRT: +35.24 kgf [19.48–51.00], p < 0.001) and relative muscular endurance (FRT: +9.97 repetitions [1.68–18.27], p = 0.020; TRT: +14.11 repetitions [5.84–22.38], p < 0.001), with no significant differences between FRT and TRT group (p = 0.164, 0.353 and 0.320). FRT reported significantly higher enjoyment than TRT (p = 0.034). These

Findings: suggest FRT and TRT produce comparable improvements in strength and endurance under volume-matched conditions, both superior to control. FRT was more enjoyable, indicating it may serve as a practical alternative for time-constrained young adults, though further research on long-term adherence is warranted. Clinical Trial Registration : Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500115052.

Read the original β†’