Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Physiologic Adaptations to Modifying Resistive Load and Time Under Tension During Expiratory Muscle Strength Training.

Dakin AE, Rau S, Villarreal-Cavazos K, Easterly K, Huber JE, Garber CE et al. · Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026

Researchers had 20 healthy young adults perform expiratory muscle strength training (breathing out against resistance) under four conditions that varied resistance (50% vs 75% of maximum expiratory pressure) and how long each breath was held (0.2 s vs 1 s), measuring rib cage and abdominal movement, submental (under-chin) muscle activity, and perceived effort. The conditions produced significantly different acute responses, with rib cage excursion 5-24% of maximum, abdominal excursion 6-19%, submental muscle activation 40-57%, and varying ratings of perceived exertion.
Takeaway: Adjust both the resistance and the duration of each breath in expiratory muscle training, since each changes how hard the respiratory and throat muscles work.
Abstract (source)

Purpose: The

purpose of this study was to test the impact of modifying resistive load and time under tension (TUT) on respiratory excursion, submental excitation, and ratings of perceived exertion/effort (RPE) during expiratory muscle strength training (EMST). Task specificity between EMST, cough, and swallowing was also explored.

Method: Participants were outfitted with respiratory bands, submental surface electromyography, and a microphone. Tasks included maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) testing, voluntary and reflex cough testing, cup sips, and EMST. EMST included three sets of 10 repetitions in four conditions: short (0.2 s) at 50% MEP, long (1 s) at 50% MEP, short at 75% MEP, and long at 75% MEP (L75). Outcomes were respiratory kinematics, cough airflow, submental excitation, and RPE. Multilevel models and pairwise comparisons were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Twenty healthy adults ( M age = 27 ± 5 years) participated. There were significant effects between EMST conditions where rib cage excursion ranged from 5% to 24% (of maximum), abdominal excursion ranged from 6% to 19%, submental excitation ranged from 40% to 57%, and RPE varied ( p p = .03).

Conclusions: Exercise parameters including resistive load and TUT that impacted the acute physiologic responses to EMST should be considered during exercise prescription to maximize physiologic adaptations and training specificity. Future research will examine the longitudinal impacts of modifying EMST exercise parameters on coughing and swallowing outcomes.

Read the original