Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

TRAINING-SPECIFIC FORCE–TIME ADAPTATIONS FOLLOWING PLYOMETRIC AND CONTRAST TRAINING IN VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS

Thanakorn Kaimusik, Penpak Noopud, MONTON THONGROJ · วารสารวิทยาศาสตร์การกีฬาและนวัตกรรมสุขภาพ กลุ่มมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏแห่งประเทศไทย · 2026

This study compared plyometric training and contrast training (a method combining heavy and explosive movements) against a control group in volleyball players, measuring their jumping power and force production using force plates. Both training methods improved jumping performance compared to routine practice alone, though contrast training showed greater improvements in late-phase force development and jump height.
Takeaway: Use contrast training if your goal is maximizing late-phase jumping power and height, or stick with plyometrics if you want simpler early-phase explosive development.
Abstract (source)

This study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of plyometric training (PLY) and contrast training (CT), combined with routine volleyball practice, against a control group (CON) in 45 male collegiate volleyball players. To minimize baseline variability, participants (N = 45) were ranked according to their 0–5 m sprint times, organized into matched triplets, and randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to the Contrast Training (CT), Plyometric Training (PLY), or Control (CON) group (n = 15 per group). Countermovement jump (CMJ) biomechanical variables, including peak power, relative peak power, rate of force development (RFD), impulse, and jump height, were assessed using a force platform and analyzed using multivariate and repeated-measures ANOVA. The

Results: showed significant improvements in CMJ force–time characteristics in both experimental groups compared with CON (p .05). Further pairwise comparisons revealed distinct mechanical adaptation profiles between the training modalities. CT demonstrated significantly better outcomes than CON and outperformed PLY in selected late-phase variables, such as Peak RFD90, Relative Peak RFD90, and Gross Impulse300 (p .05). In

Conclusion: , both PLY and CT effectively improved jumping performance compared with routine volleyball practice alone, through distinct mechanical adaptation profiles across temporal phases. CT produced greater improvements in late-phase RFD and jump height, whereas both

Methods: significantly improved early-phase rapid force development, with no significant differences between them. These

Findings: highlight the practical application of force–time profiling to individualized training prescription

Read the original →