Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Head Acceleration Event Probabilities During Standardised Contact Drills in Academy Men's Rugby League

Ryan White, Daniel Weaving, Cameron Owen, Gregory Roe, Thomas Sawczuk, James Tooby et al. · European Journal of Sport Science · 2026

Researchers fitted 15 academy rugby league players with instrumented mouthguards and filmed three training sessions to measure how often standard contact drills produced head acceleration events (HAEs). Across 1402 drill reps, only about 9% produced an HAE of at least 5 g; standing wrestle drills were highest (41.3%) and tackle shield hits from 1 m lowest (1.3%), tacklers had more HAEs than ball-carriers, and higher-magnitude events (≥25 g) occurred in under 1.1% of reps.
Takeaway: Choose lower-impact contact drills like short-distance shield hits over standing wrestles when you want to limit head acceleration exposure in training.
Abstract (source)

This study investigated head acceleration event (HAE) probabilities between common contact-drills in rugby league. Fifteen professional male academy players participated in three training sessions, completing standardised contact-drills while wearing custom-fitted iMGs, all sessions were filmed. HAE data (peak linear acceleration and peak angular acceleration) were captured, synchronised, and processed alongside video data. Binomial logistic regression and ordinal mixed-effect regression models were used to calculate overall and exceedance probabilities. Data included 1402 (93 ± 50 per player) contact-drill observations, of which 133 had HAEs ≥ 5 g (9 ± 8 per player). Substantial variability in probability for HAEs ≥ 5 g (1.3%-41.3%) was observed across drills. Standing wrestle had the highest HAE ≥ 5 g probability (41.3%; CI: 31.0%-52.3%), while tackle shield hits at 1 m had the lowest (1.3%; CI: 0.5%-3.4%). HAE probability was greater for tacklers than ball-carriers. Overall, probability of a HAE ≥ 25 g was < 1.1%. Standardised contact-drills varied in HAE probabilities, but chances of higher magnitude HAEs was low for all drills. Overall, the probability of a HAE during standardised contact-drills was low, although practitioners should consider the differences (i.e., the variability) in HAE probabilities when managing HAE training exposure.

Primary studyOpen accessVelocity-Based & Technology
Read the original