Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

How Stable Are Temporal EMG Parameters in Rowing? A Seven-Day Test-Retest Reliability Study Using Wearable sEMG.

Kresevic S, Vignandel E, Martini M, Arreghini D, Deodato M, Buoite Stella A et al. · Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026

Researchers had 15 competitive rowers perform two all-out 2000 m trials a week apart while wearing a wireless surface EMG system, then checked how repeatable the timing of muscle activation was across seven major muscles. Muscle activation onset was highly repeatable between sessions and each rower's overall activation waveform stayed very similar, but offset, peak position, and active duration were less consistent; amplitude and active duration both followed a reproducible U-shaped pattern over the course of the trial.
Takeaway: Focus on muscle activation onset and overall waveform shape when using wearable EMG to track rowing technique over time, and treat duration or peak-timing changes with caution.
Abstract (source)

Surface electromyography (sEMG), increasingly delivered through wireless wearable systems, is a key non-invasive tool for the

Objective: monitoring of muscle activation during repetitive motor tasks. The clinical and longitudinal usefulness of wearable sEMG during rowing depends on the test-retest reliability of the parameters extracted from the signal during high-intensity, multi-muscle cyclic locomotor tasks. This study aimed to use advanced sEMG processing to quantify the between-session reliability of EMG-derived parameters (onset, offset, active duration, and peak position) across seven major muscles, to characterize the between-session similarity of ensemble-averaged activation waveforms, and to describe within-trial activation dynamics. Fifteen competitive rowers (10 males, five females; aged 14-22 years) performed two identical 2000 m all-out trials seven days apart, with sEMG recorded by a wireless wearable system. Reliability was assessed by ICC(A,1) with 95% CIs, SEM, MDC 95 , CV%, and Bland-Altman analysis. The waveform similarity of the session ensemble cycles was quantified by Pearson correlation, cosine similarity, normalized cross-correlation maximum, and normalized dynamic time warping (DTW). Within-trial dynamics were assessed across ten consecutive stroke-count windows. Onset showed excellent reliability across all seven muscles (ICC = 0.943-0.995); offset, moderate-to-excellent (0.524-0.907); peak position, poor-to-excellent (0.114-0.948); active duration, poor-to-good (0.077-0.814). Ensemble-waveform similarity between sessions was high for each athlete across all muscles (Pearson r = 0.832-0.972; cosine similarity = 0.924-0.983), confirming that the individual activation fingerprint of the mean stroke cycle is stable over a 7-day interval. Both amplitude (FMPR) and active duration revealed a reproducible U-shaped within-trial pattern. These

Findings: highlight the potential of wearable sEMG to provide reliable, personalized insights into rowing-specific muscle activation patterns, supporting more individualized monitoring and training optimization in rowers.

Read the original