Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

The effects of 8-week wearable resistance training on neuromuscular adaptations in soccer players

Bo Tang, Mingyue Hou, Rui Yang · Frontiers in Physiology · 2026

Thirty trained male college soccer players did 8 weeks of normal technical-tactical training, with half wearing light weights (2% of body mass on the legs) three sessions per week and half wearing unloaded placebo garments. The weighted group improved more in 10-m and 30-m sprints, jump height, and rate of force development, while maximal strength and muscle size/architecture didn't change, and perceived training load was similar between groups.
Takeaway: Add light wearable leg loads (~2% of body mass) to a few in-season practice sessions per week to sharpen sprinting and jumping without extra training stress.
Abstract (source)

Purpose: Although wearable resistance training (WRT) has been shown to enhance athletic performance, the underlying neuromuscular and morphological mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study investigated the effects of an 8-week in-season WRT program on physical performance and neuromuscular adaptations in collegiate soccer players.

Methods: Thirty highly trained male soccer players were stratified and randomly assigned to a WRT group (n = 15; age: 22.8 ± 2.9 years; height: 180.1 ± 6.2 cm; body mass: 76.1 ± 7.4 kg; 2% body mass load distributed on the lower limbs) or a control group (CON, n = 15; age: 22.2 ± 3.3 years; height: 178.7 ± 5.5 cm; body mass: 74.3 ± 6.5 kg; unloaded placebo garments). Participants completed three weekly intervention sessions over an 8-week period, integrated into their regular technical-tactical training. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included 10-m and 30-m sprint times, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, 5-0-5 change-of-direction (COD) time, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque, knee extensor isometric rate of force development (RFD), normalized vastus lateralis RMS amplitude, and ultrasound-derived vastus lateralis architecture (muscle thickness and pennation angle).

Results: Mixed-

Design: ANOVA revealed that the WRT group demonstrated significantly greater improvements than CON in 10-m (Cohen's d = -1.18, p = 0.025) and 30-m sprint times (d = -0.85, p = 0.016), CMJ height (+10.97%, p 0.05). Session-RPE training loads did not differ between groups.

Conclusion: Low-load WRT (2% body mass) is an effective modality for enhancing multidirectional explosive performance. The increase in RFD without concomitant changes in maximal strength or muscle morphology suggests that these functional gains are primarily driven by early-phase neural adaptations rather than structural hypertrophy. Practically, WRT represents a time-efficient in-season micro-dosing strategy that may augment explosiveness without significantly increasing perceived internal training load.

Read the original