Menu

HomeHow it worksContact UsContact Us

Validations and applications of markerless motion capture using OpenCap: a scoping review

Xiaochen Zhang, Dunkai Mao, Haonan Shang, Liuchen Ma, Juncheng Jia, Jia Yu et al. ยท Frontiers in Digital Health ยท 2026

This scoping review pooled 51 studies on OpenCap, a free smartphone-based markerless motion capture system, to assess how accurately it measures movement and where it can be used. Compared with lab-standard systems, OpenCap was most accurate for sagittal-plane (side-view) measures, for the lower body rather than the upper body, in healthy rather than clinical populations, and during squats and walking rather than jumping.
Takeaway: Use smartphone-based OpenCap for side-view lower-body analysis of squats and walking, but treat upper-body or jumping data with caution.
Abstract (source)

Background: Recent advances in computer vision have substantially enhanced the accessibility and applicability of markerless motion capture systems. Among the available markerless motion capture platforms, OpenCap is a freely accessible, smartphone-based system that has received growing attention in biomechanics. Its applications have extended beyond controlled laboratory environments into field-based settings and beyond basic kinematic analysis to more complex clinical and sports-related applications. However, evidence regarding its concurrent validity, measurement accuracy, and reliability remains fragmented across study populations, movement tasks, and application contexts. This scoping review was designed to address two main research questions: (1) What evidence is available regarding the concurrent validity, accuracy, and reliability of OpenCap? (2) To what extent is OpenCap applicable across clinical, sports, and field-based settings?

Methods: This review therefore synthesizes existing evidence on the validation and practical applicability of OpenCap. The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The systematic search identified 51 eligible studies, which included validation studies and applied studies using OpenCap.

Results: Comparisons with reference-standard systems indicated that OpenCap performed most accurately for sagittal-plane measurements. Accuracy was generally higher for lower-extremity measurements than for upper-extremity measurements, in healthy individuals than in clinical populations, and during squatting and walking tasks than during jumping tasks.

Conclusion: Future research should focus on expanding validation datasets across heterogeneous populations, improving tracking robustness under occlusion, and integrating multimodal sensing with large language model-assisted interpretation to support automated and context-aware biomechanical assessment.

Scoping reviewOpen accessVelocity-Based & Technology
Read the original โ†’